Advance Decisions Search
(* = Appeal Withdrawn)
21-045
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioners (the parents) appeal, pursuant to section 8 NYCRR 279.10(d) of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education, from an interim decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) determining the student's pendency placement during a due process proceeding challenging the appropriateness of respondent's (the district's) recommended educational program for the student for the 2020-21 school year. The IHO determined that the student's pendency placement was the placement established pursuant to an unappealed IHO decision, dated June 8, 2020 (June 2020 IHO decision). The appeal must be dismissed.

21-044 *
21-043 *
21-042 *
21-041
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which did not grant all of the relief sought by the parent to remedy respondent's (the district's) failure to offer or provide the student with an appropriate educational program and services for the 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20 school years. The appeal must be sustained in part.

21-040
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioners (the parents) appeal from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which dismissed some of the issues raised during the hearing as being moot. The appeal must be dismissed.

21-039 *
21-038 *
21-037 *
21-036 *
21-035 *
21-034 *
21-033 *
21-032
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied her request for compensatory educational services and other relief. The appeal must be sustained in part.

21-031
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied her requests for pendency and for the costs of the student's provider of special education teacher support services (SETSS) at an enhanced rate for the 2019-20 school year. The district cross-appeals from that portion of the IHO's decision which ordered it to fund the cost of the student's SETSS and related services. The appeal must be sustained in part. The cross-appeal must be sustained.

21-030
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioners (the parents) appeal from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which determined that respondent (the district) offered their son an appropriate educational program for the 2018-19 school year. The appeal must be dismissed.

21-029
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioners (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied her request that respondent (the district) fund the costs of privately obtained special education services at an enhanced rate for the 2019-20 school year. The appeal must be dismissed.

21-028
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied her request for direct payment for special education instructional services for the 2019-20 school year. Respondent (the district) cross-appeals from that portion of the IHO's decision which failed to determine whether the parent was legally obligated to pay for the special education services provided to the student. The appeal must be dismissed. The cross-appeal must be sustained.

21-027 *
21-026
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied her request that respondent (the district) fund the costs of privately-obtained special education teacher support services (SETSS) at an enhanced rate for the 2019-20 school year. The district cross-appeals from that portion of the IHO's decision which ordered it to fund the costs of the student's SETSS at the district standard rate for the 2019-20 school year. The appeal must be dismissed. The cross-appeal must be sustained.
