Advance Decisions Search
(* = Appeal Withdrawn)
21-145 *
21-144 *
21-143
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the district) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which found that it failed to offer an appropriate educational program to respondent's (the parent's) son and ordered it to reimburse the parent for her son's tuition costs at the International Institute for the Brain (iBrain) for the 2020-21 school year. The parent cross-appeals from the IHO decision to the extent that the IHO did not address specified issues. The appeal must be sustained. The cross-appeal must be dismissed.

21-142
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied her request to be reimbursed for her son's tuition costs at the Fusion Academy (Fusion) for the 2019-20 school year. The appeal must be sustained.

21-141 *
21-140
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied her request to be reimbursed for her daughter's tuition costs at the International Institute for the Brain (iBrain) for the 2019-20 school year. The appeal must be dismissed.

21-139 *
21-138
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which declined to award the parent all of the relief requested for the denial of equitable services by respondent (the district) for the 2019-20 school year. The appeal must be dismissed.

21-137 *
21-136
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioners (the parents) appeal from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied their request to be reimbursed for their son's tuition costs at the International Institute for the Brain (iBrain) for the 2018-19 school year. Respondent (the district) cross-appeals from the IHO's determination that it failed to demonstrate it offered to provide an appropriate educational program to the student for the 2018-19 school year. The appeal must be sustained. The cross-appeal must be dismissed.

21-135
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the district) appeals from those portions of a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which determined that the IDEA's statute of limitations did not bar respondents' (the parents') claims relating to their daughter's 2018-19 school year and which required the district to reimburse the parents for the costs of an independent educational evaluations (IEE) of the student. The parents cross-appeal from that portion of the IHO's decision which rejected their specific arguments relating to the application of the statute of limitations and which limited the amount that the district would be required to fund for the costs of the IEE. The appeal must be dismissed. The cross-appeal must be sustained.

21-134 *
21-133
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied, in part, his request for compensatory educational services and other relief. The appeal must be dismissed.

21-132
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which found that respondent (the district) offered the student an appropriate educational program and denied her request to be reimbursed for her son's tuition costs at the International Institute for the Brain (iBrain) for the 2019-20 school year. The district cross-appeals from the IHO's decision ordering the district to reevaluate the student and develop a new IEP. The appeal must be dismissed. The cross-appeal must be sustained.

21-131 *
21-130
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioners (the parents) appeal from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which determined that respondent (the district) offered the student appropriate special education programming and denied their request to be reimbursed for their son's tuition costs at the IVDU – Boy's High School (IVDU) for the 2019-20 school year. The appeal must be dismissed.

21-129
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioners (the parents) appeal from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied their request to be reimbursed for their daughter's tuition costs at the Windward School (Windward) for the 2019-20 school year. Respondent (the district) cross-appeals from the IHO's determination that it failed to demonstrate that it met all procedural requirements in its review of the student's eligibility for special education as a student with a disability. The appeal must be sustained in part. The cross-appeal must be dismissed.

21-128 *
21-127
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the district) appeals from the decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which found that it failed to offer an appropriate educational program to respondent's (the parent's) daughter and ordered it to extend the student's age-eligibility from September 2020 through December 2020, to review the student's transition plan, and as needed, to evaluate the student. The appeal must be sustained.

21-126
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which determined that the educational program and services respondent's (the district's) Committee on Special Education (CSE) had recommended for the student’s 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20 school years were appropriate.The appeal must be dismissed.
