Decisions
(* = Appeal Withdrawn)
24-604
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied, in part, her request for direct payment of the costs of her daughter's attendance at the International Academy for the Brain (iBrain), 1:1 nursing services, and special transportation services for the 2024-25 school year. Respondent (the district) cross-appeals from the IHO's finding that it did not offer the student a FAPE for the 2024-25 school year. The appeal must be sustained in part. The cross-appeal must be dismissed.

24-603
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which granted respondent's (the district's) motion to dismiss the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeal must be sustained, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-602
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioners (the parents) appeal from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which granted respondent's (the district's) motion to dismiss the parents' due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeal must be sustained, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-601
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which, among other things, denied her request that respondent (the district) fund the costs of her daughter's private services delivered by EDopt for the 2023-24 school year, and denied her request for a bank of compensatory education. The district cross-appeals from portions of the IHO's decision, alleging additional grounds for dismissing the parent's due process complaint notice and denying the parent's relief. The appeal must be sustained. The cross-appeal must be dismissed.

24-599
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied his request that respondent (the district) fund the costs of his daughter's unilaterally obtained services for the 2023-24 school year. The appeal must be dismissed.

24-598
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which dismissed the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Respondent (the district) cross-appeals, asserting that the parent failed to prove that any unilaterally-obtained services were appropriate to meet the student's unique needs. The appeal must be sustained, the cross-appeal dismissed, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-597
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which dismissed the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Respondent (the district) cross-appeals, asserting alternative grounds to dismiss the parent's due process complaint notice. The appeal must be sustained, the cross-appeal dismissed, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-596
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioners (the parents) appeal from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied their request that respondent (the district) fund the costs of their daughter's privately obtained special education services for the 2023-24 school year. The district cross-appeals from that portion of the IHO's decision which denied its motion to dismiss the parents' due process complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeal must be dismissed. The cross-appeal must be dismissed.

24-595
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which dismissed the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeal must be sustained, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-594
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioners (the parents) appeal from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which granted respondent's (the district's) motion to dismiss the parents' due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeal must be sustained, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-593
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied her request that respondent (the district) fund the costs of her son's private services delivered by Yeled v'Yalda (Yeled) for the 2023-24 school year. The appeal must be dismissed.

24-592
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which dismissed the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Respondent (the district) cross-appeals, asserting that the parent failed to prove that any unilaterally-obtained services were appropriate to meet the student's unique needs. The appeal must be sustained, the cross-appeal dismissed, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-591
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied his request that respondent (the district) fund the costs of his son's private services delivered by Keep Children Moving for the 2023-24 school year. The district cross-appeals from those portions of the IHO's decision which denied its motion to dismiss the parent's claims based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and determined that the district waived an affirmative defense. The appeal must be dismissed. The cross-appeal must be sustained in part.

24-590
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which dismissed the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Respondent (the district) cross-appeals, asserting alternative grounds to dismiss the parent's due process complaint notice. The appeal must be sustained, the cross-appeal dismissed, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-589
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which granted respondent's (the district's) motion to dismiss the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeal must be sustained, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-587
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which granted respondent's (the district's) motion to dismiss the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to review the parent's claims following an impartial hearing. The district cross-appeals, alleging additional grounds for denying the parent's request for funding of unilaterally obtained services provided to the student during the 2023-24 school year. The appeal must be sustained in part. The cross-appeal must be dismissed. The matter is remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-586
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which dismissed the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Respondent (the district) cross-appeals, asserting alternative grounds to dismiss the parent's due process complaint notice. The appeal must be sustained, the cross-appeal dismissed, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-584
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which granted respondent's (the district's) motion to dismiss the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeal must be sustained, and the matter remanded to the IHO for further proceedings.

24-583
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the district) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which determined that the educational placement recommended by its Committee on Special Education (CSE) for respondents' (the parents') daughter for the 2023-24 school year was not appropriate. The appeal must be sustained.

24-582
This proceeding arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) and Article 89 of the New York State Education Law. Petitioner (the parent) appeals from a decision of an impartial hearing officer (IHO) which denied her request that respondent (the district) fund the costs of her son's private services delivered by EDopt, LLC (EDopt) for the 2023-24 school year. The district cross-appeals from the IHO's decision denying its motion to dismiss the parent's due process complaint notice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeal must be sustained. The cross-appeal must be dismissed.

Pages
Click here to use the Advance Decisions Search page.